What do physicians read

This is why doctors are always looking for top medical journals that will provide the latest breakthroughs in medical research and practical tips for improving sales, revenue, and online reputation. In addition to your favorite healthcare blogs such as Practice Builders , podcasts, e-Books, and online forums, subscribing to medical publications is a great way to stay up-to-date, get proven inputs on how to be a better doctor, or just read engaging content from and about thousands of other healthcare providers.

So, which medical publications should you keep on your radar? We suggest starting your search with these five must-read healthcare publications. PubMed, a medical website from the US National Library of Medicine, provides doctors with abstracts and full articles on various medical topics.

These articles are well researched, authenticated, and peer-reviewed. The content is designed for healthcare providers in mind. The site is also the right place to refer to patients to help them make an informed decision. Launched in , Medscape is a high-quality, medical-specific website. This popular site has received accolades from both physicians and general readers.

Medscape is known as a starting point for high-quality, peer-reviewed medical information. Users can register free on the site and access about 50 peer-reviewed journals, full-text articles, latest news in the medical world, and links to practice guidelines.

In this cohort, peer-reviewed literature was a valued source of clinical information that influences clinical decisions. Proper publication planning and execution remains a vital channel to effectively communicate clinical evidence to HCPs. Several barriers, including journal paywalls, limit the communication of clinical data to HCPs.

Medical publication professionals should actively seek and promote the use of journals with suitable open-access options. HCPs want faster, easier access to clinical trial data and publications. Communicating clinical information through additional channels that allow easier engagement, e. We sought to re-evaluate their importance in communicating clinical data to health-care professionals HCPs.

Primary care physicians PCPs and oncologists from all EU5 countries and the USA completed an anonymous internet-based survey examining access, reading behaviors, and the impact of clinical data published in peer-reviewed journals. Peer-reviewed publications remain an important information source that influences clinical decision-making among HCPs. The findings were based on , patients admitted to Florida hospitals for myocardial infarction over a year period.

While researchers found a survival-rate bump for all patients treated by female doctors, the difference was pronounced for patients on the XX end of the gender spectrum. But it does reinforce the idea that doctors need to understand the way that factors like gender, as well as race, might affect how health conditions manifest in different patients.

But on Zocdoc, patients have total say over who examines them. An interesting trend emerged: While younger female patients chose female doctors more often than not, their allegiance to women declined gradually with age. The older female patients were, the more likely they were to see male doctors. As for men, they favored male doctors from the post-college years through the golden years, and their same-gender preference increased with age too.

The only age group where male and female patients both favored female doctors was patients 19 and younger. We can assume that many if not most of these appointments were made by parents. Only women in their 20s showed a preference for female doctors comparable to that of younger patients; starting at 30, the odds of women choosing a same-gender doctor fell. Caballero also looked at the raw percentages of appointments with male and female doctors booked by patients in different groups.

The same trajectory emerged: Older women opted for men. Our analysis does have limitations. The Zocdoc patient pool is disproportionately heavy on certain demographic groups, such as millennial women and New Yorkers. We also employed a binary definition of gender. Research that explores how patients make healthcare decisions using a more nuanced conception of gender is warranted. Some specialties, like gynecology, cardiology and urology, are disproportionately heavy on one gender, but Caballero looked at the data with and without bookings for those specialties.

The association between doctor gender, patient gender and patient age bore out no matter how Caballero sliced the data. Every expert I talked to had the same question: Do our results reflect the availability of male and female doctors on Zocdoc? Overall, Zocdoc has about the same number of male and female doctors, and patients book appointments with both genders at similar rates. During the year-long period we analyzed, While doctor gender is less balanced within some specialties, Caballero accounted for that in her analysis.

One major reason is that patients can use various filters to narrow down their search results. This feature lets patients view only those doctors who meet their needs and preferences, but it can also inadvertently leave them with a page of results dominated by one gender.